The greatest challenge in AI adoption is not the technology; it is locating the problem worth solving.

Dave Keys

05.04.26

4 min read
The greatest challenge in AI adoption is not the technology; it is locating the problem worth solving.

Every AI vendor promises efficiency, cost reduction, and capacity lift. But when an organisation procures a tool before precisely defining its purpose, those promises evaporate into stalled deployments and expensive software licenses. You end up having solved a theoretical problem, not a real-world one.

The difference between a failed AI pilot and a successful, self-funding capability often boils down to a single, critical first step: the deliberate identification of operational friction.

The Flaw in Finding Friction

Many leadership teams begin their AI journey by asking the wrong question: "How can we use AI?".

This leads to two common failure modes:

  1. Solution looking for a problem: The organisation buys a tool because the demo was impressive, and now the internal team is forced to invent use cases to justify the purchase.
  2. Imitation, not strategy: The organisation copies a competitor's AI initiative, failing to account for differences in internal workflow, data quality, or regulatory context.

Neither approach delivers durable commercial value because they bypass the messy reality of the organisation's operations.

How to Properly Identify High-Value Friction

At aify, we frame the correct starting point as an audit. Before evaluating any tool, an organisation must conduct a clinical review of its workflows to answer one question: Where is human capability being throttled by manual work, fragmented information, or repetitive cognitive tasks?

This exercise requires looking beyond vanity metrics and looking deeply into your operations:

  • Manual Reconciliation: Look for processes that require high-value staff to manually cross-reference data between two or more unconnected systems (e.g., matching rostering records to billing). These are high-friction, low-judgement tasks perfectly suited for automation.
  • Information Silos: Identify where critical data sits locked away in unstructured formats (emails, PDF notes, paper files) or in systems that do not communicate. AI can be used to structure and surface this information, but the silo itself is the core friction that must be mapped.
  • Repetitive Cognitive Load: Focus on tasks where professional judgement is necessary but is delayed or consumed by repetitive drafting, summarisation, or mandatory reporting (e.g., incident note structuring or drafting routine communications).

Friction is not just "time spent". It is the opportunity cost of having your best people consumed by work that an AI could reliably handle.

The aify Approach: Focusing on Use Cases That Pay for Themselves

Identifying friction points is necessary, but not enough. You need a disciplined way to choose which friction points to solve first-the ones that will more than pay for the investment.

This is the purpose of our Gateway Discovery Workshop, which has two key outputs that drive commercial focus:

  1. Current State Assessment: This is the clinical audit that surfaces where friction exists and produces a factual picture of the organisation's readiness across buyer, data, and governance dimensions.
  2. Opportunity Heatmap: We take the identified friction points and evaluate them against two axes: commercial value and implementation risk.

The goal of the Heatmap is not to chase the most impressive use case. It is to find the Pathfinder Use Case, the one with high commercial value and manageable implementation risk. This ensures the first AI deployment is genuinely viable in 90 days and delivers a measurable outcome.

By prioritising based on this Heatmap, we ensure that the initial investment delivers rapid, proven ROI. This deployed capability then builds internal momentum and credibility, creating the platform for future, more complex scaling. Structured identification and ruthless prioritisation of friction is the non-negotiable first step to compounding AI value. The Gateway Discovery Workshop is aify's entry point for new client engagements. It produces a Current State Assessment, Opportunity Heatmap, and 90-Day Pathfinder Roadmap-the three outputs that ensure your AI strategy is anchored in commercial value from day one.

About the author

Dave Keys, Chief AI Officer | Founder of aify

Dave has spent more than 25 years working with data, business technology and the people who depend on it. He has trained hundreds of users, led governance programs and built the infrastructure organisations rely on every day.

Through aify, Dave now partners with Australian mid-market leaders to move beyond AI hype and establish secure, outcome-focused AI capability. His work is grounded in structured discovery: bringing the right people into the room, asking the right questions and surfacing the real operational friction that technology alone cannot solve.

As an AI Officer as a Service, Dave helps organisations identify business waste, prioritise high-value AI opportunities and embed the policies, guardrails and governance needed to turn AI from fragmented experimentation into controlled, measurable results.